Showing posts with label Cheating case against Builder in Mumbai. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cheating case against Builder in Mumbai. Show all posts

Monday, 30 April 2018

Sebi questions Raymond over real estate deals

Sebi has written to Raymond questioning its real estate agreements for JK House and an Alibaug property used as a guest house

Mumbai: The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has written to Raymond Ltd questioning the textile maker’s real estate agreements for JK House Ltd and a property at Alibaug used as a guest house, said three people with direct knowledge.

The regulator has also questioned whether the firm made any related-party transactions that were not reported to shareholders after Sebi’s Listing Obligation and Disclosure Requirements (LODR) norms came into force in September 2015, these people said.


Real Estate Reviews - Cheated Buyers


“This is the same old issue that is being referred to more than a month ago where we stated that Sebi had sought certain clarifications which have been duly addressed and we are compliant with all regulations. Since there is no new development in this context and the matter is old and already reported, this query from Mint does not merit any response,” said a spokesperson for Raymond in an emailed response.

An email sent to Sebi on Friday was not answered.

The markets regulator had first sent some queries about JK House, a 13 June Moneycontrolreport said. Subsequently, the regulator had again written to Raymond in August, one of the people cited earlier said.

In its first letter to Raymond, Sebi asked for the agreement involving JK House, where members of the promoter family are involved in a legal battle over the thwarted sale of four redeveloped flats. According to a 2007 agreement, these flats were to be sold to Singhania family members. Raymond shareholders rejected this proposal after the firm’s board put it for approval earlier this year after proxy firms pointed out that the sale price was at a deep discount to current market rates.

Subsequently, former Raymond chairman Vijaypat Singhania and his cousins Akshaypat and Anant Singhania, approached the Bombay high court against Raymond and Pashmina. An arbitration is underway.

The second Sebi letter questions transactions related to the Alibaug property, its lease deed, rental agreement between the company and its subsidiaries—Pashmina Holdings and Avani Agricultural Farms Pvt. Ltd.

The agreement was to use the Alibaug house as a guest house. Originally, the property was with Pashmina Holdings; later it was sold to Avani Agricultural. In 2013, the property was let out to Silver Apparel Ltd, another wholly owned subsidiary, Raymond said in its response to Sebi queries. A copy of its reply has been reviewed by Mint.

“Raymond’s expense towards Alibaug house on the company’s books could be in violation of Sebi listing regulations and norms towards related party transactions. The multi-layered agreement and details were not shared with shareholders,” said the person cited earlier.

“Appropriate disclosures...have been made in the Annual Reports of the Company from time to time,” said Raymond’s response. “Further, we submit that the Company has not entered into any material related party transactions since the coming into effect of the Listing Regulations.”

Raymond’s response did not say whether this transaction was shared with shareholders.

“Sebi is examining the responses. In addition, Sebi has also taken information from stock exchanges pertaining to Raymond—this includes its financial numbers, corporate announcements and Raymond’s shareholding pattern for the past five years,” said another person from the three cited earlier.

“Everyone is questioning the rental agreements, however this is a subject of market conditions. Any property of a listed company belongs to shareholders and not to any specific class of shareholders,” said J.N. Gupta, co-founder and managing director of Stakeholder Empowerment Services, a proxy advisory firm.

Best Real Estate Review Website - Cheated Buyers


Thursday, 8 March 2018

Promoter of Mumbai's Dixit Realties arrested in second cheating case

Promoter of Mumbai's Dixit Realties arrested in second cheating case

Cheating case against Builder - Cheated Buyers


MUMBAI: The EOW on Tuesday arrested builder Shirish Dixit of Dixit Realties in another cheating case filed by a group of lawyers.

Last week, Dixit was arrested for allegedly cheating 21 tenants of a Wadala building. Dixit had entered into an agreement with the tenants in 2008 and promised to complete the redevelopment work in 34 months.

In 2015, the tenants learnt that he had mortgaged the property to Dhiren Patel of Sanghoi Group and availed a Rs 10-crore loan. In the new case, police said Dixit and other directors of his firm, under pretext of redeveloping Janki Nivas in Matunga, allegedly lured six advocates to invest over Rs 13 crore in his project, but sold it to Vijay Manjrekar.

But Dixit’s advocate Mohan Tekavde said he is already in police custody. “This is being done by some business competitors.” —S Ahmed Ali

Join the Largest Community of Whatsapp Group of Real Estate Buyers in India on Best Real Estate Review Website for more information and news related to builders.


Wednesday, 24 January 2018

Builder of India's tallest residential building fined Rs 162 crore for violations

The controversial project has been embroiled in litigation for the past four years after NGO Janhit Manch dragged the developer, Shree Ram Urban Infrastructure Ltd (SRUIL), to court for large-scale violations.

The developer of Palais Royale, India’s tallest residential building (294 m), will have to pay the BMC Rs 162 crore as premium and penalties for constructing a 15-storey public parking tower at Worli Naka without permissions. Municipal commissioner Ajoy Mehta last week ordered the levy after the Bombay high court directed the commissioner to decide its fate following a petition challenging its legality.

The controversial project has been embroiled in litigation for the past four years after NGO Janhit Manch dragged the developer, Shree Ram Urban Infrastructure Ltd (SRUIL), to court for large-scale violations. The NGO said the public parking tower is illegal.

Under the state government’s cross-subsidy policy, the developer received permission to build a 15-storey parking tower in 2010, which it has to hand over free of cost to the BMC for public parking. In return, the developer will receive additional construction rights in the form of incentive floor space index (FSI) for the residential tower named Palais Royale.

However in 2011, the BMC changed its policy, restricting the height of public parking lots up to four floors. By then, SRUIL had procured construction permission only up to the plinth level. However, it continued to build the entire parking tower before Janhit Manch challenged the legality on the grounds that sanction was only till the plinth level. The municipal corporation too directed the developer to build the parking tower according to the new policy (four floors).

As much as 74% of the total built-up area (5.88 lakh sq ft) of the skyscraper has been shown as fire refuge area. This was sanctioned by the then chief fire officer when the building plans were approved about eight years ago. Mehta wants the fire refuge area reduced to around 30%; Mehta's predecessor Sitaram Kunte had ordered that they be restricted to just 4% of the built-up area. Mehta also ordered that large refuge areas outside each apartment in the 56-storey tower be punctured or blocked. This will prevent flat owners from illegally amalgamating the areas -adjoining the bedroom and drawing room --to the apartments.

Join the largest Whatsapp group of Real Estate Buyers on Best Real Estate Review Website.